NCFL Grand Nationals PF Debate Topic

1 reply [Last post]

PF Debate Topic:

"Resolved: That the constitutional right of freedom of religion has wrongly evolved into freedom from religion."

Anony's picture

I'm not a Pf Debater, but I read this resolution and I couldn't stop from thinking how Totalitarian it would be to control religious thought.  Either when the mind chooses to follow some form of religion or chooses not to it is our Constitutional right to have freedom of thought/speech.  To say that a "Constitutional right...wrongly involved" implies, IMO, that the government should control religion, which would be un-Constitutional... 

PF Debaters, how would you guys handle this?

Post reply